Want to have a humdinger battle over the relative merits of
capitalism and socialism?
I thought not! So how about something more akin to – “Is the
present US economic system working for you?”
Well, it’s certainly rocking for the top 1% of American
households who own more wealth than the bottom 90%.
Meanwhile, real wages (adjusted for inflation) have barely
increased since the 1970’s, despite negligible unemployment and a booming job
market?
This last detail troubles me greatly, for despite all my
roaring good times in that blessed decade, I was poorer than any church mouse.
In fact, once when soliciting an apartment on Avenue B, the
landlord advised me to “go on Welfare, bud! That way I’ll definitely get my
rent.”
I got the apartment – without Welfare – but life would have
been a lot simpler if I’d been in the 1% these last 40 years.
I doubt many of that financial class read the Echo; although
apparently President Trump always begins his Wednesday staff meetings with, “What’s
Kirwan writing about me today?”
Flattery indeed, but nowadays we’re being duped by politicians
right across the spectrum. And while we support them in their ideological
bloodletting, large corporation are printing money, as they say in Canarsie.
Didn’t President Obama rescue the banks during the Great
Recession and how about President Trump giving away the shop to big business courtesy
of his 2017 Tax Relief Act?
It can be argued that President Obama had little choice,
with the whole financial system collapsing around his ears. But who ended up
paying for it?
You got it - Joe and Josie Blow the taxpayer!
They’ll continue to shell out for President Trump’s deficit
ballooning 40% cut in corporate taxes - particularly if interest rates rise as
expected.
And what so far have the corporations done with their $1.5
trillion windfall? Well instead of investing in jobs and long-term capital
improvements they’ve bought back their stock to the tune of $900 billon –
further enriching the 1%.
Does anyone honestly expect Joe and Josie’s real wages to
rise in the next 40 years, particularly with the “gig” economy gathering steam?
So, the one shot we have is to curtail rising costs.
I know, you’re blue in the face hearing that US health care
is absurdly expensive compared to the Canadian model.
Having experienced emergency rooms in both countries, I can
honestly say there was little difference in the quality of care either side of
the border.
But wait there’s an admirable movement afoot to introduce
Medicare for All that would bring us closer to the Canadian system.
The problem is that many people down here are satisfied with
the health coverage provided by their employers. However, with costs continuing
to rise, most corporations would be only thrilled to pass on this expensive obligation
to the government.
Health care companies, as you might imagine, want no part of
such a change. But why should we give a fiddler’s about them and their profits?
With Medicare for All the US government could also dictate
fairer prices from the drug companies, as happens in many industrial countries.
Everything I’ve just proposed however is just a pipe dream. We
can barely keep the L train running, let alone reform a complicated health care
system.
But a compromise might be possible if politicians would drop
their catcalls of “capitalism” and “socialism,” drink a few pints together and
cut a deal that for once might benefit the 90% – for instance, allowing those
over the age of 50 to choose between Medicare and private coverage.
Given this choice, corporations would shovel their eligible employees
into less expensive Medicare.
But even this is unlikely to happen since health insurance
and drug companies are already furiously greasing their politicians’ palms.
Meanwhile, the deficit balloons, the 1% grows wealthier, and
poor Joe and Josie continue to take their partisan cues from Fox TV and MSNBC
blowhards.
I’ve been wasting my time this past 40 years so I’m finally
joining the 1%! Where’s my cell
phone?
“Hello, Mr. President, Kirwan from The Echo here… I have
this killer idea – how about you, me, and the Russians go into business and
develop the Lower East Side into a five star Golf Course? I have connections
with this landlord down on Avenue B…”
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome short comments on Belfast Media Group blog postings but you should be aware that, since we've put our names to our articles, we encourage you to do so also. Preference in publication will be given to those who provide an authenticated full name — as is already the case in our newspapers. Comments should be short and relate to the subject matter and, of course, shouldn't be libelous. And remember, if you find that there isn't enough space on our blogs for your views, you can always start your own. There are over two million blogs out there, another one can only benefit the blogosphere.