Ah, it’s a great old country. We might only have
presidential elections every four years, but candidates may toss their hats in
the next ring before the last winner has even waltzed into the Oval Office.
However,
in the interests of sanity, I never write about upcoming elections until 21
months beforehand, which makes me a Johnny-Come-Lately, for the fields on both
sides are already teeming with candidates.
Still,
it looks like 1992 all over again with the Clinton-Bush dynasties squaring up.
There’s a calming quality to these
names, in that neither seems likely to drive the car off the cliff. Though, on
closer inspection, both already did in a little matter concerning the invasion
of Iraq that a Bush initiated and a Clinton okayed.
Toss
in the near collapse of capitalism in the financial crisis of 2008 and you get
another strike against the Bush clan. But that’s all ancient history, since most
of us can barely remember last week, let alone Autumn 2008 or Spring 2003.
Besides
what Democrat in their right mind would run against Mrs. Clinton? Oh I forgot -
she isn’t even running yet. But she’ll need to decide soon, if only to give her
party a viable chance of retaining the White House. So, let’s check out the
Democratic field.
Gov.
Martin O’Malley could move into the White House right now – he only lives up
the road in Maryland. Don’t underestimate this Celtic Rocker. He may not be
showing well in polls, but he’s smart and tenacious, and knows all the words to
The Fields of Athenry. Besides, he’s principled, pragmatic and a friend of 20
years. I’d vote for him.
Senator
Jim Webb is intriguing and may be a dark horse. He’s one of our Scots-Irish
brethren and had no problem in standing up to President Bush over Iraq.
Then
there’s Vice-President Biden – a decent man, a big ego, and lots of chits to
call in, but he doesn’t seem to be anyone’s flavor nowadays.
Senator
Elizabeth Warren is the other great lady in waiting! The stock markets would
swoon, and she’d put manners on the financial industry; but she’s not running –
for now.
What’s
not to love about Senator Bernie Sanders - the Vermont socialist from Flatbush?
Raise the red flag, comrade! He’ll enliven any debate with his sharp tongue and
intellectual heft.
Given
the Sheldon Silvers fiasco, it’s unlikely that Gov. Cuomo will even test the waters.
2020 seems a far safer option.
Now
I know Mr. Jeb Bush is the most formidable Republican: he’s a Catholic convert,
speaks Spanish, will have loads of money, and doesn’t frighten old ladies.
But take a look at Senator Rand
Paul. Sure, he’s got loads of libertarian baggage, but heck I’m even drawn to
him for his opposition to blowing the hell out of other countries. This
ophthalmologist sees what the Bushes and Clintons don’t – a $100 Iraqi IED can
destroy a $150,000 American armor-plated Humvee.
The
guy can play all sides too: while singing Hallelujah with the God and Guns
brigades, he’s not quite Attila The Hun on immigration; and I’ve yet to hear
anyone question his integrity.
The
Rev. Huckabee will split the fundamentalist vote in Iowa with Mr. Santorum, and
both will run out of God and cash in New Hampshire.
Gov. Christie still has the George
Washington Bridge hanging over him – besides Mr. Bush will wipe the floor with
him in the financial donors department – and having cash to burn on two
projected Republican Super-Tuesdays, March 1 and 14th, 2016
will be essential.
Senator
Cruz will raise hopes and dreams with the Tea-Party faithful, but he’ll have to
watch his back since he’s the most hated man in Congress. Senator Rubio will
raise his profile for 2020, but he’s going nowhere with his state-mate Bush at
the starting gate.
Governors Jindal, Pence and Kasich will
be pawns on the board. However, Gov. Walker, the Wisconsin union destroyer,
will be there at the finish. And perhaps, beyond!
Still,
it will likely come down to the old guard, Bush and Clinton, and the perception
that neither will drive the family car off the cliff. How soon we forget!
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome short comments on Belfast Media Group blog postings but you should be aware that, since we've put our names to our articles, we encourage you to do so also. Preference in publication will be given to those who provide an authenticated full name — as is already the case in our newspapers. Comments should be short and relate to the subject matter and, of course, shouldn't be libelous. And remember, if you find that there isn't enough space on our blogs for your views, you can always start your own. There are over two million blogs out there, another one can only benefit the blogosphere.